About Me

Name: Eripides
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

New Scientific Research Refutes Unsubstantiated Claims Regarding Homosexuality

This photo has absolutely nothing to do with the article on changing homosexual patterns. I just thought it was cool.

New research shows that homosexual men and women do not suffer harm through counseling to change homosexual behavior. Though my gay friends won't agree with the source of the claim out of principle, the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality announced the new findings in the Journal of Human Sexuality.
"This research is a significant milestone when it comes to the scientific debate over the issue of homosexuality," said NARTH president Dr. Julie Hamilton. "It also confirms what we have seen evidenced in hundreds of individuals who have benefited from the help of NARTH therapists. We believe that every person should have the right to independently determine their own course in life and for many that involves seeking counseling options that affirm their personal beliefs." (NARTH)
Though pro-gay and worded in the negative, the American Psychiatric Association admits that previous research was inconclusive.
To date, there has been no scientifically adequate research to show that therapy aimed at changing sexual orientation (sometimes called reparative or conversion therapy) is safe or effective. (APA)
The NARTH research is good news for those who find themselves confused about expressing homosexual behavior and who wish to reject homosexual behavior according to their personal beliefs. It is also good news for faith-based programs that reach out to homosexuals who desire to change their behavior. Homosexuals no longer have to feel pressure from gay activists and gay propaganda that they have no control over their lives and choices.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Steamroller Nancy, or How Democrats Push Climate Change Legislation

The US House of Representatives posed to pass a stunningly long and complex bill to "control" climate change. What will it really do?

Another massive bill sits at the crest of passing the US House of Representatives. Dubbed climate change legislation by the news media, the 1200 page bill comes up for a final vote today and will likely pass through the House. Politico reports:
The House neared a decisive vote on sweeping climate-change legislation Friday afternoon — with Democratic leaders racing to corral votes on a bill that Republicans said they hadn’t even seen yet...

Republican accused the Democrats of ramming the bill through the House. Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.) asked repeatedly if there was even a copy of the current version of the bill anywhere in the House chamber. Democratic Rep. Ellen Tauscher, in the speaker’s chair, repeatedly dodged the question.

Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), one of the bill’s sponsors, finally rose to say that a single copy of the current version of the bill was available at the speaker’s desk – and on the Internet, which members would have to leave the floor to access. (Politico)

Here's my beef. Why does Nancy Pelosi keep insisting on ramming through bills this year which obviously have deep and lasting impact on the US, especially when no one, absolutely no one, incredibly no one, let me repeat no one, has any idea what these bills will do.

No one yet has any idea of the far-reaching problems and effects of this year's stimulus bill. Nearly all current analyses are not favorable.

No one knows has any idea what the effects will be of such sweeping changes to US energy policy implanted in this current bill. No one can even follow the pork, since no one's seen the final version of the bill in time to vote for it.

No one knows what's really in the bill. I doubt a single member of the House has a clue what's included. I know they don't have a clue of the bill's ramifications should it pass into law.

What can we conclude from this style of government - this pass first and ask questions later approach?

We can conclude that House Democrats are more concerned with political correctness than with correct politics. We can conclude that Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats are less concerned with the environment than with hiding the contents of their legislation. We can conclude that lobbies are a far, far worse problem than anyone suspects. We can conclude that the President and Congress have more concern for their pet project than for the American people. We can conclude that rising energy costs (and be certain they will significantly rise) are not important to government. (Energy costs will effect everyone, the poor as well as the rich, despite the "protections" in the current bill.) We can conclude that those who hold power for the moment have absolutely no concern for the wishes and will of the American people.

Can we afford to gamble our future on such a pass first, ask questions later government? Can you afford it?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »